Why We Need Humanity
In a world struggling with rapid industrialization,
massive immigration, and chaotic urban growth,
science and technology seemed to offer
solutions to almost every problem.
Many Americans came to believe
that scientific certainty could solve
not only scientific problems,
but could also reform politics,
government, and business.
Two world wars and a Great Depression
rocked the confidence of many people
that scientific expertise alone could create a prosperous
and ordered world.
After World War II,
the academic world turned with
new enthusiasm to humanistic studies,
which seemed to many scholars the best way to
ensure the survival of democracy
and to resist tyranny.
In the America of our own time,
the great educational challenge has become an effort
to strengthen the teaching of
what is now known as the STEM disciplines
(science, technology, engineering, and math).
There is considerable and justified concern
that the United States is falling behind
much of the rest of the developed world
in these essential disciplines.
India, China, Japan, and other regions
seem to be seizing technological leadership.
At the same time, perhaps inevitably,
the humanities-while still popular
in elite colleges and universities
-have experienced a significant decline.
Humanistic disciplines are seriously underfunded,
not just by the government and the foundations
but by academic institutions themselves.
Humanists are usually among
the lowest-paid faculty members
at most institutions and are often lightly regarded
because they do not generate grant income
and because they provide no obvious credentials
for most nonacademic careers.
There is no doubt that American education
should be training more scientistsand engineers
and should be teaching scientific literacy
to everyone else.
Much of the concern among politicians
about the state of American universities today
is focused on the absence of "real world" education.
But the idea that institutions
or their students must decide between humanities
and science is false.
Our society could not survive without scientific
and technological knowledge.
But we would be equally ruined
without humanistic knowledge as well.
Science and technology teach us
what we can do.
Humanistic thinking can help us
understand what we should do.
The humanities are not simply vehicles
of aesthetic reward
and intellectual inspiration,
as valuable as those purposes are.
Science and technology aspire to clean,
clear answers to problems.
The humanities address ambiguity, doubt,
and skepticism-essential supports in a complex
and diverse society and a turbulent world.
It is not surprising
that many of our greatest scientists are
also deeply committed to humanistic knowledge
and values.
Nor should it be surprising
that many humanistic fields find
scientific tools essential to their work.
Many liberal-arts institutions have
developed similar curricular goals.
Among academics,
scientists and humanists not only coexist,
but often collaborate.
It is almost impossible to imagine our society
without thinking of the extraordinary achievements of scientists
and engineers in building our complicated world.
But try to imagine our world as well
without the remarkable works
that have defined our culture and values.
We have always needed, and we still need, both.